Navigating the complexities of private offerings just got a bit easier. On March 12, 2025, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance released a no-action letter providing much-needed clarity on how issuers can satisfy the accredited investor verification requirements under Rule 506(c) of Regulation D. This development expands the permissible methods of verification, granting fund sponsors and issuers more flexibility, especially when relying on general solicitation.
In this post, we dive into what the SEC’s letter means, the new flexibility granted, and why this matters to investment advisers.
Rule 506(c) allows issuers to broadly advertise their private offerings but requires “reasonable steps” to verify that all investors are accredited. Traditionally, this meant collecting personal financial documentation or using costly third-party verifiers, which could create operational hurdles.
The SEC’s no-action letter clarifies that issuers can now rely more on high minimum investment thresholds coupled with investor representations, provided they do not have actual knowledge contradicting such claims. This means that fund sponsors can reduce invasive documentation collection and expensive third-party checks without sacrificing compliance.
The letter outlines a tiered approach based on investor type and investment amount. Natural persons must invest at least $200,000, affirm accredited investor status, and ensure no third−party financing, with the issuer lacking contradicting knowledge. Entities accredited by assets require a minimum $1,000,000 investment, with similar affirmation and conditions. Entities with all equity owners accredited must invest $1,000,000 in aggregate or $200,000 per owner (if five or fewer owners), affirm all owners’ accredited status, and confirm no third-party financing, under the same issuer knowledge condition.
This framework expands flexibility while stressing the importance of honesty and due diligence.
It’s important to note that this letter does not establish a new safe harbor under Rule 506(c). Instead, it confirms that under the rule’s existing principles-based framework, issuers may satisfy their verification duties using this flexible approach in appropriate cases.
Issuers must still assess each situation carefully, remain alert to any red flags or inconsistent information, and exercise judgment based on facts and circumstances.
For investment advisers involved in private placements, this update offers several benefits:
However, advisers must remain vigilant to their continuing obligations, including:
The SEC’s no-action letter on accredited investor verification under Rule 506(c) marks an important evolution in simplifying private offering compliance. By recognizing the reasonableness of using high minimum investments combined with investor representations, the SEC helps investment advisers streamline the fundraising process without compromising investor protection.
As with all regulatory updates, maintaining careful compliance and exercising sound judgment remain paramount. Investment advisers should update their verification practices accordingly to take advantage of this relief while continuing to safeguard their clients and comply with all relevant rules.
Staying informed and adaptable is key—embrace the SEC’s updated guidance to improve your private offering strategies today!
Download the complete First Quarter 2025 Regulatory Update today to find out more.
Post Tags :
SEC Compliance
Mr. Smith is a highly-experienced securities lawyer, chief compliance officer, and business attorney with over 24 years of experience strengthening the legal and compliance functions of investment advisers, broker-dealers, and investment vehicles.
May 28, 2025
High-quality legal and compliance services from a global perspective without the big law firm price tag.
+1 202-854-0515
info@lawvisory.com
1250 Connecticut Ave NW #700, Washington, DC 20036
Attorney Advertising—LawVisory PLLC is a U.S. law firm and provides this information as a service to clients, prospective clients, and other friends for educational purposes only. It should not be construed or relied on as legal advice or to create a lawyer-client relationship.